Sunday 23 November 2014

My Objection to the latest changes to the Brimsham Development

My objections to the latest Heron proposals for changes to their development. Burying cables and increasing the intensity of housing in certain areas. It still misses the point about lack of road infrastructure and or public transport.



I object to the changes to these plans on the following basis.

1.   Traffic – Road infrastructure cannot cope with increase in traffic.
This development when taken together with other recent and planned developments at Chipping Sodbury and Yate will increase traffic in the Sodbury/Yate area by adding 8000 residents with 24000 extra journeys. The majority of this traffic will head for Bristol from this development via Randolph Avenue, Leach Pool lane and Peg hill, Via Iron Acton, Winterbourne and Coalpit Heath and end up in the heavily congested North Bristol Area.

2.   Site Access -Increased risk of danger to Children
The plans will still require heavy construction vehicles to travel very quiet roads that are crossed by children travelling to and from the local Brimsham Green Secondary school and Yate Outdoor sports facility. Without additional lights or crossings this is likely to result in accidents.

3.   Intensification of the Development – Drainage and Skyline issues
The changes to the plan move blocks of 3 storey houses closer to the Long Croft Road community. This will not only impact the skyline but could have an impact on water drainage to the site. As highlighted in the Environmental Statement.

4.   Development traffic flow impeded
The original design (DESIGN_AND_ACCESS_STATEMENT_-_PART_7) document described “…attractive well connected, permeable street networks that encourage most people to walk or cycle to local destinations…” The changes, which seem to be a response to builders’ commercial concerns, remove the connection bit, impeding access to most of the North East quadrant of the development.

5.   Funding – Developers obligations not effectively directed
I believe some the funding being proposed £2,140,000 towards the cost of new bus services and £5,527,000 towards the cost of
Off -site highway improvements would be better spent on a North Yate Train stop adjacent to the development. Increasing bus services on already congested roads will not encourage people to use them. Increasing the size of roads is shown to increase the traffic (M25 effect)thus causing increased congestion and pollution.
A new North Yate train station would have the added advantage of making the industrial units more attractive to prospective clients and the homes to new residents. They would provide wider access to the Yate Outdoor Sports facility and could move as much as 50% of the work related travel on to the trains.

Tuesday 4 November 2014

Planning Re Conultation Letter for Herons North Yate Development

Just recieved an update on the Heron Planning application for North Yate. I understand this may involve changes to the Power Lines across the site.
Documents with a Reference of PK12/1913/O are available at
http://developments.southglos.gov.uk/online-applications/. 
Most of the documents referencing the changes are dated 2014 at the bottom of the page.
The key document appears to be one titled "Large Document" . The link below if it works  is the main document that describes all the latest changes.Sections 7.7 (page 48) and 7.8 (Page 49) show the main changes in layout.
Beware this document is very large and takes a very long time to download. Make a cup of tea and have a slice of cake.


http://developments.southglos.gov.uk/online-applications/files/7606F33D62AEB88385A7E629BAC9BF9F/pdf/PK12_1913_O-LARGE_DOCUMENT-REVISED_DESIGN___ACCESS_STATEMENT-4887503.pdf


PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE comment on the documents before 25/11/2014 it gives everyone another chance to register our concerns about the development. these changes could reduce the amount of green space and possibly fragment it so making less usable. I'm not sure if putting high voltage cables underground will make much difference.

The other main concern has to be traffic which was always the
been a serious concern with this document.

Wednesday 14 May 2014

 

Has Yate got a local plan??? 

If we have we can get more money out of the developers for local infrastructure - Is that right?
Draft Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). South Glocs Council are now consulting on this document that requires developers to pay for local infrastructure.

Read it and weep www.southglos.gov.uk/DraftCIL.
Prizes might be awarded for those with the strength and fortitude to send a response to the council. 
But be quick the consultation window is only  12th May – 23rd June 2014
www.facebook.com/BrimshamParkCommunityCampaign
Twitter @brimshamC